Giftedness:
Assessments
By Lisa Raine, Jasmine
Richardson, Karen Bravo-Elder, & Marjorie Ryles
“One of the major
concerns in gifted education has been the problem of identification and its
measurements correlates” (Winzer, 2008, p. 293). It is an inexact science. Assessment measures for giftedness,
creativity, and talent are tests of mental ability, achievement tests,
portfolios, observation, and teacher, parent, peer, and self-nomination. “There is little evidence to indicate that
any one identification procedure is better than another” (Winzer, 2008, p.
295).
Tests of Mental Ability
“Individual IQ tests
appear to be the best single method for identifying children who have superior
cognitive abilities. The tests possess high validity as predictors of success
in academic settings, and their scores are relatively stable over time”
(Winzer, 2008, p. 297). “A shortened
measure of an IQ test is highly desirable. There are two types of shortened
intelligence tests. Those created independently and marketed as short tests and
those that exist as short forms of already well established, more involved IQ
scales. Scales such as the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence” (Winzer,
2008, p. 297).
Achievement Tests
“Achievement tests can
be employed systematically to identify children with gifts and talents who are
already achieving at a high level academically.
These tests have been used very successfully to identify school children
who are performing extremely well in specific fields, such as mathematics”
(Winzer, 2008, p. 297).
Portfolios
“A portfolio is a type
of performance test made up of continual collections of a student’s work”
(Winzer, 2008, p. 297). “Portfolios include information selected by the student
under the guidance of the teacher, as well as a series of statements that
reflect a student’s thoughts about the contents. The portfolio will include
work samples and projects, and may include the results of tests” (Winzer, 2008,
p. 298). “Portfolios serve to examine the learning process as well as the
outcomes of learning; they stress products rather than tests and test scores;
and their use is appealing because of their instructional relevance” (Winzer,
2008, p. 298).
Observation
Observation of young
children is an important method of assessment for giftedness. “A three-year old may be observed to tackle
mathematical problems that are taught in grade 3” (Winzer, 2008, p. 298). This is another reason for parents and
guardians to play and interact with their young children.
Teacher Nomination
“Teacher nomination has
traditionally been, and remains today, a major method in the identification of
students who may be gifted, talented, and creative” (Winzer, 2008, p.
299). “The paradox is that, accurate as
teachers are in identifying students with potential problems, they are not very
good at all in pinpointing gifted learners” (Winzer, 2008, p. 298). This may be
because teachers may not be looking for the right things. Some teachers may rate one sex over another,
some focus on conformist high achievers, and some may not focus enough on
creative free thinkers. “One early study found that teachers were only 50%
successful when requested to identify those students whom they considered to be
gifted and talented” (Winzer, 2008, p. 298).
Parent, Peer, &
Self-Nomination
“Parent nomination
questionnaires are another economical means of identifying children who are
gifted and talented. Parents see their children make up games and stories,
invent and build things, solve problems, and create all sorts of products”
(Winzer, 2008, p. 299). “Peer nomination is yet another method for initiating
referral. Although experts in the field have been favourable in their attitude
to this style, there is still a serious lace of research to support it”
(Bennet, et al 2008, p.134). “Self-nomination is most effective with older
students who display specific types of talents” (Bennet, et al 2008,
p.134). Self-nominations are usually followed
or accompanied by a teacher or parent nomination. Teachers and parents are sometimes the
student starts to acknowledge or realize they are gifted.
Problems With
Assessments of Giftedness
Identification and
assessments in the areas of giftedness are riddled with problems. There are
many unanswered questions regarding who is identified and how to identify
individuals who may or may not possess giftedness. There are many individuals whose talent,
creativity, and giftedness simply get overlooked for a variety of reasons. This is unfortunate because their skills go
uncultivated.
“I was slightly brain damaged at birth, and I want people like me to see
that they shouldn’t let a disability get in the way. I want to raise awareness
– I want to turn my disability into ability!”
~
Susan Boyle, Music Artist
·
Albert Einstein was four years old
before he could speak and seven before he could read.
·
Isaac Newton did poorly in grade school.
·
A newspaper editor fired Walt Disney
because he had “No good ideas”.
·
Leo Tolstoy flunked out of college.
Bennet, S., Dwort, D.,
& Weber, K. (2008) Special Education
in Ontario Schools (6th ed.).4
St. Davids, Canada: Highland Press.
Winzer, M. (2008). Children With Exceptionalities in Canadian
Classrooms (8th ed.). Toronto,
Canada:
Pearson Prentice Hall.
I know of a parent who feels that two of their children are gifted. This parent is frustrated that the teacher does not challenge their children. In fact the teacher has these children helping or essentially teaching their peers. This parent feels that the teachers are teaching to those in the class that have difficulties not looking at the diverse learning styles.
ReplyDeleteIt is important to recognize and nurture the development of exceptional abilities so that all students can be identified by their strengths and areas of need.Educational programming should be designed and implemented to match their identified needs.Furthemore, Teachers of gifted students participate in professional development to increase knowledge, skills and understanding of gifted students and required instruction.
ReplyDelete